Can control of a battlefield change while it is being contested?

The idea that control of a battlefield remains unchanged while it is being contested reflects the mechanics often found in strategy games like Riftbound. In many games, control can be dynamic, potentially shifting in response to actions taken by players. However, this option highlights a specific rule or principle within the game that emphasizes stability during contestation periods.

When a battlefield is contested, it typically means that both players are actively trying to gain dominance over that area. The concept here is that control is firmly established until definitive actions transpire that can lead to a transfer of that control. This means players cannot simply lose or gain control based on ongoing actions or presence in that area without specific triggers, modifications, or conditions met.

Therefore, affirming that control remains unchanged during contestation helps simplify strategic decision-making, encouraging players to think ahead and plan for decisive actions that will result in a change of control, rather than expecting fluid shifts based on ongoing gameplay decisions.