In a situation where two players disagree on damage assignment, what is the ruling?

In cases where two players disagree on damage assignment, the ruling states that the player assigning the damage has the final say. This means that when a player is in the process of deciding how to distribute damage among their targets, their decisions regarding that assignment are binding unless there is a clear rule violation or misunderstanding.

This is rooted in the principle of having a clear structure in gameplay where the active player—who is currently taking actions—holds authority over their decisions during that turn. It promotes an orderly resolution process for situations that may lead to disputes, allowing the game to progress smoothly. The finality of the assigning player's say ensures that the gameplay remains fluid and reduces the potential for confusion or endless discussions about damage distribution.

The other options, while they might suggest various approaches to handling disagreements, do not align with the established rules for how damage assignment should be determined during gameplay.